Ojo: pataleta.
A ver, José Luis (José Luis se llama Kyle Chayka, en este caso). Ya me he comprado tu libro. Y lo he comenzado a leer, con ganas, porque te compro, de salida, la tesis. No me puedes salir ahora con argumentos que no se aguantan de ninguna de las maneras, cuando apenas hemos comenzado el dichoso libro. No puedes. Vale. Sí puedes. Ya lo he visto. Pero no deberías, José Luis. Y no te hace falta, además, hostia. Y hieres la sensibilidad de los posibles lectores con neurona encendida. Que haberlos, haylos (supongo: mi neurona está, en los mejores momentos, en modo ahorro de energía).
¿Tenemos que irnos siempre al dichoso «cualquier tiempo pasado fue mejor» para criticar cosas que han surgido [relativamente] recientemente [y merecen ser criticadas, claro que sí, con furia, incluso]? Que sí, que los algoritmos de recomendación, o se hacen con extremo esmero y, además, se alimentan con mimo, o el aplanamiento cultural es su resultado más natural. Weapons of math destruction, como decía Cathy O’Neil. Que estamos de acuerdo. Pero no, eso no quiere decir qur todo lo que había antes fuera maravilloso. Había cosas maravillosas, y debemos defenderlas, mimarlas, estudiarlas y reproducirlas (casi mejor evolucionarlas, sí es posible). Pero también había mucha mierda, José Luis. Que ese diario que te parecía (y probablemente era) un horror de extrema [inserte la lectora aquí el lado político que no le guste]… lo editaba alguien que, mal que nos pese reconocerlo, era una persona. Que esa radiofórmula infame que aplanaba culturas antes de que nacieras, José Luis, la programaba una personita. Que, por acelerar un poco y no hacer eterno este párrafo, Joseph Goebbels no es el nombre de un algoritmo, y ni siquiera fue el primero en jugar a ese deleznable juego. Todo eso ya estaba ahí. Y «algoritmo de recomendación caca, selección humana siempre bien» (nótese el énfasis en «siempre») es un razonamiento de patio de colegio. Y, José Luis, tu «nunca mal», al fin y al cabo, es un «siempre bien», no me vengas con.
Abuf. Fin de la pataleta. Por el momento.
![THE BIRTH OF A COMPUTER
CONDUCTED BY JOHN C. NASH
An interview with James H. Wilkinson on the building of a computer designed by Alan Turing
The story of the construction of the first computers is both fascinating and instructive. Understanding the insights and decisions of computing's innovators may explain how the technology evolved to its present state and may illuminate the directions it might take in the future. Among computing's innovators were Alan Turing (see page 65 for a review of a Turing biography) and the men he assembled to help him build a computer based on his Universal machine. Turing's team included James H. Wilkinson, a mathematician who had studied at Cambridge and worked for the British government as a ballistics engineer doing numerical analysis of explosives problems during World War II.
This interview was conducted for BYTE by Dr. John C. Nash and took place on July 13, 1984. at the Ninth Householder Gatlinburg Conference held at the University of Waterloo,
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
BYTE: Dr. Wilkinson. how did you become involved with Alan Turing and his computer?
JHW: Shortly after the war. I discovered that a Mathematics Division was being set up at the National Physical Laboratory (NPL). I got in touch with E. T. Goodwin. who had been a colleague of mine at Cambridge in the Maths Lab. He was one of the first to join this new division. He invited me to have a chat with him at NPL in Bushy Park, Teddington. and there I met Turing, who I knew already
by reputation as something of an eccentric. Turing and I had a long discussion. and I was very impressed with him. Presumably he must have been
reasonably satisfied with me since he said if I came to NPL he would like me to work with him. I think that this offer and my friendship with Goodwin were the decisive factors. So in May 46, six and a half years after I joined the government service. I moved to NPL (as I thought then, temporarily) in
stead of going back to Cambridge University.
Turing had worked alone on the
logical design of an electronic computer. When I arrived, he had presented his plans to what you might call a "review committee" at NPL. This
consisted of a small group of Fellows from the Royal Society. The committee decided that Turing's ideas were basically sound, and they gave him a
mandate to go ahead and recruit the appropriate staff.
Up to that time everything associated with the project had been done by Turing himself. He was a man with an original and inventive mind. His
design had practically nothing in common with the group of computers which arose out of discussions at the Moore School of Electrical Engineering at the University of Pennsylvania. John W. Mauchly and J. Presper Eckert had already successfully completed
the construction of the first electronic computer, the ENIAC (this was not a stored-program computer), and their influence was at its peak. When I went
to NPL in May '46. Turing was working on what he called version 5 of [his] computer, though I never saw any
documents relating to versions 1 to 4. Turing was not a great documenter, and no doubt the earlier versions were buried in the rubble on his desk. Perhaps I should attempt to give some idea of the flavor of version 5,
a typical Turingesque creation. It was... (continued)](https://obm.corcoles.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-10.png)
